pentext/xml/doc/examples/examplereport.xml
Peter Mosmans 121bc5b268 Added radicallyopensecurity/templates/xml
This version has been tagged 'templates' in the original repository
2016-07-25 22:49:31 -07:00

295 lines
18 KiB
XML
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><pentest_report xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" findingCode="SID" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../dtd/pentestreport.xsd">
<meta>
<title>Penetration Test Report</title>
<xi:include href="client_info.xml"/>
<targets>
<target>fishinabarrel.sittingduck.com</target>
</targets>
<collaborators>
<reviewers>
<reviewer>Melanie Rieback</reviewer>
</reviewers>
<approver>
<name>Melanie Rieback</name>
<bio>Melanie Rieback is a former Asst. Prof. of Computer Science from the VU,
who is also the co-founder/CEO of Radically Open Security.</bio>
</approver>
<pentesters>
<pentester>
<name>Melanie Rieback</name>
<bio>Melanie Rieback is a former Asst. Prof. of Computer Science from the VU,
who is also the co-founder/CEO of Radically Open Security.</bio>
</pentester>
<pentester>
<name>Aristotle</name>
<bio>Greek philosopher and scientist born in the Macedonian city of Stagira, Chalkidice, on the northern periphery of Classical Greece.</bio>
</pentester>
<pentester>
<name>George Boole</name>
<bio>English mathematician, philosopher and logician. Works in the fields of differential equations and algebraic logic, and is now best known as the author of The Laws of Thought.</bio>
</pentester>
<pentester>
<name>William of Ockham</name>
<bio>English Franciscan friar and scholastic philosopher and theologian. Considered to be one of the major figures of medieval thought. At the centre of some major intellectual and political controversies.</bio>
</pentester>
<pentester>
<name>Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein</name>
<bio>Austrian-British philosopher who works primarily in logic, the philosophy of mathematics, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of language.</bio>
</pentester>
</pentesters>
</collaborators>
<classification>Confidential</classification>
<version_history>
<version date="2015-01-19T01:00:00" number="auto">
<v_author>Patricia Piolon</v_author>
<v_description>Initial draft</v_description>
</version>
<version date="2015-01-20T01:00:00" number="auto">
<v_author>Ernest Hemingway</v_author>
<v_description>Structure &amp; contents revision</v_description>
</version>
<version date="2015-01-21T01:00:00" number="auto">
<v_author>Patricia Piolon</v_author>
<v_description>Added threat levels and recommendations</v_description>
</version>
<version date="2015-01-22T01:00:00" number="auto">
<v_author>Patricia Piolon</v_author>
<v_author>JRR Tolkien</v_author>
<v_description>Revision</v_description>
</version>
<version date="2015-01-23T01:00:00" number="auto">
<v_author>Patricia Piolon</v_author>
<v_description>Revision</v_description>
</version>
<version date="2015-01-26T01:00:00" number="1.0">
<v_author>Arthur Conan Doyle</v_author>
<v_description>Finalizing</v_description>
</version>
</version_history>
<xi:include href="snippets/company_info.xml"/>
</meta>
<generate_index/>
<section id="executiveSummary">
<title>Executive Summary</title>
<section id="introduction">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Sitting Duck B.V. (“Sitting Duck”) has assigned
the task of performing a Penetration Test of the FishInABarrel Web
Application to Radically Open Security BV (hereafter “ROS”).
Sitting Duck has made this request to better evaluate the security of the application and
to identify application level vulnerabilities in order to see whether the FishInABarrel
Web Application is ready, security-wise, for production deployment.</p>
<p>This report contains our findings as well as detailed explanations of exactly how ROS performed
the penetration test.</p>
</section>
<section id="scope">
<title>Scope of work</title>
<p>The scope of the Sitting Duck penetration test was limited to the following
target:</p>
<generate_targets/>
<p>The penetration test was carried out from a black box perspective: no information
regarding the system(s) tested was provided by Sitting Duck or FishInABarrel, although FishInABarrel
did provide ROS with two test user accounts.</p>
</section>
<section id="objectives">
<title>Project objectives</title>
<p>The objective of the security assessment is to gain insight into the security of
the host and the FishInABarrel Web Application.</p>
</section>
<section id="timeline">
<title>Timeline</title>
<p>The FishInABarrel Security Audit took place between January 14 and January 16,
2015.</p>
</section>
<section id="results">
<title>Results in a Nutshell</title>
<p>During this pentest, we found quite a number of different security problems
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities, both stored and reflected, Cross-site
Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities,
information disclosures (multiple instances), and lack of
brute force protection.</p>
</section>
<section id="findingSummary">
<title>Summary of Findings</title>
<generate_findings/>
<!-- generated from Findings section -->
</section>
<section id="recommendationSummary">
<title>Summary of Recommendations</title>
<generate_recommendations/>
<!-- generated from Findings section -->
</section>
</section>
<xi:include xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" href="snippets/report/methodology.xml"/>
<section id="recon">
<title>Reconnaissance and Fingerprinting</title>
<p>Through automated scans we were able to gain the following information about the
software and infrastructure. Detailed scan output can be found in the sections
below.</p>
<table border="1"><tr><th>Fingerprinted Information</th></tr>
<tr><td>Windows XP<br/>Microsoft IIS 6.0<br/>PHP 5.4.29<br/>jQuery 1.7.2<br/>Mailserver XYZ<br/>FTPserver ABC</td></tr></table>
<section id="scans">
<title>Automated Scans</title>
<p>As part of our active reconnaissance we used the following automated scans:</p>
<ul>
<li>nmap <a href="http://nmap.org">http://nmap.org</a></li>
<li>skipfish - <a href="https://code.google.com/p/skipfish/">https://code.google.com/p/skipfish/</a></li>
<li>sqlmap <a href="http://sqlmap.org">http://sqlmap.org</a></li>
<li>Wapiti <a href="http://wapiti.sourceforge.net">http://wapiti.sourceforge.net</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Of these, only the output of nmap turned out to be
useful; consequently only nmap and output will be discussed in
this section.</p>
</section>
<section id="nmap">
<title>nmap</title>
<p>Command:</p>
<pre>$ nmap -vvvv -oA fishinabarrel.sittingduck.com_complete -sV -sC -A -p1-65535 -T5
fishinabarrel.sittingduck.com</pre>
<p>Outcome:</p>
<pre> Nmap scan report for fishinabarrel.sittingduck.com (10.10.10.1)
Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2013-11-11 15:43 EST
Initiating ARP Ping Scan against 10.10.10.1 [1 port] at 15:43
The ARP Ping Scan took 0.01s to scan 1 total hosts.
Initiating SYN Stealth Scan against fishinabarrel.sittingduck.com (10.10.10.1) [1680 ports] at 15:43
Discovered open port 22/tcp on 10.10.10.1
Discovered open port 80/tcp on 10.10.10.1
Discovered open port 8888/tcp on 10.10.10.1
Discovered open port 111/tcp on 10.10.10.1
Discovered open port 3306/tcp on 10.10.10.1
Discovered open port 957/tcp on 10.10.10.1
The SYN Stealth Scan took 0.30s to scan 1680 total ports.
Host fishinabarrel.sittingduck.com (10.10.10.1) appears to be up ... good.
Interesting ports on fishinabarrel.sittingduck.com (10.10.10.1):
Not shown: 1674 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
22/tcp open ssh
25/tcp open smtp
80/tcp open http
110/tcp open pop3
111/tcp open rpcbind
957/tcp open unknown
3306/tcp open mysql
4000/tcp open dangerous service
Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.485 seconds
Raw packets sent: 1681 (73.962KB) | Rcvd: 1681 (77.322KB)</pre>
<p>The scan revealed a very large number of open services on this machine, which
greatly increases the attack surface; see <a href="#f2"/> for more information on the
security risk.</p>
</section>
</section>
<section id="techSummary">
<title>Pentest Technical Summary</title>
<section id="findings">
<title>Findings</title>
<p>We have identified the following issues:</p>
<finding id="f1" threatLevel="Moderate" type="Information Leak">
<title>PHPInfo Disclosure</title>
<description>
<p>The phpinfo() function of the PHP language is readable,
resulting in a listing of all the runtime information of the environment,
thus disclosing potentially valuable information to attackers.</p>
</description>
<technicaldescription>
<p>This is where the good stuff goes. We give a detailed technical description of the problem.</p>
<p>Illustrative picture of an evil hacker pondering dark deeds:</p>
<img height="10" src="../graphics/screenshot.jpg"/>
</technicaldescription>
<impact>
<p>This is where we explain how the sh*t is hitting the fan, exactly.</p>
</impact>
<recommendation>
<p>Here is where we write some tips to solve the problem.</p>
</recommendation>
</finding>
<finding id="f2" threatLevel="High" type="XSS">
<title>A terrible XSS issue</title>
<description>
<p>A general description of the problem.</p>
</description>
<technicaldescription>
<p>This is we go into great detail about the vulnerability.</p>
</technicaldescription>
<impact>
<p>This is where we explain why this vulnerability is a problem.</p>
</impact>
<recommendation>
<p>This is where we solve everything and the sun starts shining again.</p>
</recommendation>
</finding>
</section>
<section id="nonFindings">
<title>Non-Findings</title>
<p>In this section we list some of the things that were tried but turned out to be
dead ends.</p>
<non-finding id="ftp">
<title>FTP</title>
<p>The server was running FTPserver ABC, the most recent
version of this particular piece of software. Anonymous login was turned off and no
relevant vulnerabilities or exploits were found.</p>
</non-finding>
<non-finding id="mail">
<title>Mail Server</title>
<p>The server was running Mailserver XYZ, the most recent
version of this particular piece of software. No relevant vulnerabilities or
exploits were found. </p>
</non-finding>
<non-finding id="sqlInjection">
<title>SQL Code Injection</title>
<p>The following parameters are not vulnerable to SQL injection. </p>
<p>All parameters have been checked manually.</p>
<pre>-file1.php
-file2.php
-file3.php
</pre></non-finding>
<non-finding id="heartbleed">
<title>Heartbleed</title>
<p>System was not vulnerable to heartbleed.</p> </non-finding>
<non-finding id="sp2">
<title>Windows XP</title>
<p>The host is running Windows XP. As we all know, Windows XP is bulletproof.</p>
</non-finding>
</section>
</section>
<section id="conclusion">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In the course of this penetration test, we have demonstrated that the FishInABarrel
Web Application faces a range of security issues which makes it vulnerable to a number
of different attacks. Vulnerabilities found included: cross-site scripting (both stored
and reflected), cross-site request forgery, information disclosure
and lack of brute force protection.</p>
<p>Our conclusion is that there are a number of things that FishInABarrel BV has to fix before
Sitting Duck should use their software. A number of the security issues highlighted in this
report have fairly simple solutions, but these should nevertheless be fixed before use
of the FishInABarrel Web App continues.</p>
<p>We finally want to emphasize that security is a process and this penetration test is
just a one-time snapshot. Security posture must be continuously evaluated and improved.
Regular audits and ongoing improvements are essential in order to maintain control of
your corporate information security. We hope that this pentest report (and the detailed
explanations of our findings) will contribute meaningfully towards that end. Don't
hesitate to let us know if you have any further questions or need further clarification
of anything in this report.</p>
</section>
<appendix id="testteam">
<title>Testing team</title>
<generate_testteam/>
</appendix>
</pentest_report>